Search results page

Water Challenge - a blog by Peter Brabeck-Letmathe

Water management – part two: on different users and overuse of freshwater

Water for agriculture – Berri irrigation pumping station in South Australia

In my first part I outlined some basic principles for access to water for basic needs in families and water as a human right. Let me now broaden the perspective by looking at other water users and drivers of their demand, and look into the issue of widespread and increasing overdraft of freshwater.

When talking about water management, tap water often comes to mind first. But the water used in households represents only a small percentage of total freshwater withdrawals for human use, some 10-15%.

Water management – part one: water for survival as a human right

Often when I talk about water management, some people think this means water privatisation. But it is not as simple as that.

I’d like to discuss some of my ideas on this subject in a four-part post, summarising points I’ve made earlier on this blog along the way.

Water management, for me, means using water very carefully according to its value and great importance for individuals and society - making sure there is the highest possible societal outcome from the provision and use of this increasingly scarce resource.

Water shortage “has to become the first priority”

Today’s Financial Times (please note the Financial Times has a paywall) carries an excellent, in depth look by Pilita Clark at “A world without water”, in which I make the case for world leaders to make water scarcity a bigger priority than climate change.

In the piece, which draws on a range of expert views, I argue that this problem is persisting because water is “so undervalued that it is typically used inefficiently – and there is not enough investment to boost supplies”. Regular readers of this blog will recognise this as a consistent theme: the need to set a price for water in order for its essential value to be recognised.