Water and the World Economic Forum: the roles of government leadership partnership and collaboration

By Peter Brabeck-Letmathe

28 January 2013 See comments (3)

Discussions at the WEF in Davos
DISCUSSIONS AT DAVOS: Minister Edna Molewa at this year’s World Economic Forum.

The recent Davos session in Switzerland on ‘Pathways to a Sustainable Future’ was a great opportunity to meet Minister Edna Molewa from South Africa again, our strongest governmental ally in the Water Resources Group.

The discussion focused on several areas of sustainability besides water, including health (vaccination) and access to energy. When talking about water we came to a clear conclusion – when tackling challenges as great as those faced by the world today, collaboration within the strategies set by governments is essential. The crucial first step of course, is to agree on what urgent challenges require most collaboration. Encouragingly, there is growing consensus.

Ahead of this year’s meeting, over 1,000 international experts were asked to rank the biggest priorities among 50 global risks. The global water crisis came second, ahead of other pressing issues such as chronic fiscal imbalance, food shortage (which, as I have shown in other posts, is closely related to water overuse and shortage), and threats from weapons of mass destruction.

Scoring global problems is not the same as solving them. But this underlines a growing recognition of the central role water plays in all economic activities. But what is the solution? In my opinion, innovative and disruptive partnerships are crucial.

To make a material difference on the water crisis, innovative partnerships require three things, each of which I believe can be found in the public-private collaboration that we are developing through the 2030 Water Resources Group:

- Firstly, it is essential to establish a clear understanding and deep grasp of the problem. While global in scope, the water crisis manifests itself in an intensely local way. The Water Resources Group starts by helping governments to analyse and understand the gap between withdrawals and the sustainable supply of freshwater in specific watersheds. In practical terms, this is about working out how much water can be saved compared to the actual gap in supply.

- Secondly, we ensure that the approach we take is unremittingly fact-based and analytical. The aim is to help governments apply a forensic understanding of local water challenges to drive sustainable economic growth plans. This involves providing a cost curve of levers able to close the gap and advise on approaches relevant to the locality which measure how many US cents of investment per cubic meter of water is saved.

- Thirdly, innovative partnerships require the right, innovative partners. While governments are the ultimate steward of national water resources, there are limits to what they can achieve without the support of other stakeholders who also have a role to play. The 2030 Water Resources Group has made a concerted effort to mobilise knowledge and influence across the public and private sector, academia, and civil society. This combines international bodies such as the World Economic Forum and International Finance Corporation, world governments, major non-governmental organisations and other leading businesses besides Nestlé, including the Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo.

Partnerships particularly require political leadership and a strategic framework to deliver effective solutions. We were particularly fortunate and proud in this respect that our panel included Edna Molewa, South Africa’s Minister of Water and Environmental Affairs – and one of the first political leaders to understand the seriousness and complexity of the water challenge. Minister Molewa has been instrumental in establishing the South Africa Strategic Water Partners Network, a partnership between South Africa’s government and the Water Resources Group that is addressing critical water issues in the region where demand is expected to rise by 52%.

As I have blogged about previously, the results demonstrate just how powerful such collaboration can be. Through a coordinated, multi-stakeholder approach we are continuing to catalogue best practice learnings not only specific to countries, such as India, Mexico, and China, but also specific to individual river basins.

Only by bridging sectors and bringing together public, private and civil society can tackle a challenge as complex as the one at the water crisis.

As always, I am keen to hear your thoughts – particularly around how we can strengthen collaboration between different types of stakeholders.

  1. Tristan Lecomte @ Pur Projet

    30 Jan 2013 - 06:10 (GMT)

    Just a small note to support what's said above and to share about another best practice, we are developing, that was initiated by Nestle Waters for the "Vittel" brand. It consists, since 2009, in reinforcing the ecosystems of watershed areas, both in the Amazon (1st reserve of clear water in the World), which led to the plantation of more than a million trees along rivers which are confluent to the Amazon, and as well the plantation of trees at the source of the Vittel water, in France.
    Trees depollute soils & water (they capture nitrates), help replenish water content in soils, reduce erosion, and they are at the heart of the water cycle : bringing in rains, draining water and ensuring evapotranspiration to form clouds,.. Their impact goes much beyond water regulation : climate, biodiversity, yields increase and diversification..

    Thanks to the partnership that had been initiated with Nestle Waters we were then able to register with the support of the Peruvian Government more than 300 000 hectares of virgin forest into a concession for conservation for 40 years, in that same area in the Amazon where we had planted a million trees. Again, this project has multiple benefits for people and the planet (water, biodiv,..). This highlights, as M Brabeck says, that a LOT can be done via public / private partnerships. We are just at the begining of a new Era where creating shared value will just be the norm as it will show it is a way to balance economic development with environmental preservation and social justice. Long life to CSV !

    ps : anybody interested in getting more informations and impact reports on these water programs, please contact us at tristan@purprojet.com

  2. denzil weitz @ individual

    22 Feb 2013 - 01:41 (GMT)

    That is phenomenal in what was achieved, We have several such issues and challenges in Southern Africa. One country specific in the tree regard, Its also a huge help in cooling the earth and several farmers in Namibia believe that there rain cycles is related to tree foliage and coverage. Here in Oregon we also have one of those high density Poplar forests which might be used a a bio-fuel stock and often forgotten is the tremendous support system of foliage cover that increase soil fertility. Their is also an old English farming technique that uses shade and water vapor @ night to create water for animals during the day. But i will be in touch, will see how things play out, till later thanks d

  3. C.Senthil Ganesh @ Wipro

    21 Feb 2013 - 03:31 (GMT)

    Hi All,
    If we go GREEN by saving the trees we can get enough water by nature. We can stop destroying the Plants and Trees

Blog commenting form